mastercommander
LV15
Member since November 19, 2009
|
| Subject: Posted: December 22, 2009 02:41 pm |
|
|
Dude, I love C. Whitebeard! However, I would say that you CAN use him for sanctioned play. 
(Just kidding of course. )
|
|
| Back to top |
Modified on May 12, 2010 12:43 pm
|
lordstu
LV37
Member since October 15, 2008
|
| Subject: Posted: May 12, 2010 02:50 pm |
|
|
This was not that really that good of a review - the only thing I really learned was...Well, actually, I didn't really learn anything from it, so I guess that proves my point.
Maybe the review of the Sleigh stole ol' Whitey's thunder...
|
|
woelf
LV41
Member since November 10, 2008
|
| Subject: Posted: May 14, 2010 09:28 am |
|
|
| quote from lordstu: | Maybe the review of the Sleigh stole ol' Whitey's thunder...  | The Sleigh review wasn't much better.
Even though they're not legal in normal games, if you're going to take the time to "review" them you need to actual review them, don't just keep repeating that it's a promo and isn't meant for normal games.
I'm giving this a "virtual" 1-bomb, because actually rating it would give it the tenth vote needed to become eligible for a MotW and that single rating wouldn't be enough to pull it below the 3.00 threshold.
|
|
rizz
LV35
Member since June 11, 2008
|
| Subject: Posted: May 14, 2010 11:08 am |
|
|
Well I am confused as to how my vote would have ended up a 5 on a skeleton of a review. I musta either been too sleepy and clicked bad, or I had been hitting the rum. One of the two.
|
|
woelf
LV41
Member since November 10, 2008
|
| Subject: Posted: September 14, 2010 08:50 am |
|
|
| quote from woelf: | I'm giving this a "virtual" 1-bomb, because actually rating it would give it the tenth vote needed to become eligible for a MotW and that single rating wouldn't be enough to pull it below the 3.00 threshold.
|
Since this has been dragged back to the top and given its tenth rating, it's now safe to give it the "real" 1 that it has earned.
|
|
lordstu
LV37
Member since October 15, 2008
|
| Subject: Posted: February 12, 2011 04:26 am |
|
|
Trust me, there's nothing to see here, folks!
|
|
| Back to top |
Modified on February 18, 2011 01:10 pm
|
wapcaplets
LV52
Member since March 30, 2005
|
| Subject: Posted: February 12, 2011 05:17 am |
|
|
| quote from lordstu: |
With a rating under 3.5, this one did well to make it to MotW - just another example of the arcane methods the site uses to make the pick each week. Oh, well, at least the premium membership went to someone who is still here...sort of. 
|
Come on, guys. The webmaster puts so much work into maintaining this site and providing a great service there's no need for public kvetching like this. He's not getting rich off of this site and is desiging & maintaining it in his spare time. Give him a break and focus on the overwhelming majority of positive aspects of this site.
|
|
dakmor
LV12
Member since July 14, 2010
|
| Subject: Posted: February 12, 2011 09:58 am |
|
|
im upset it won. its a non-tourney-legal piece. and the review wasn't even that good.
remember you're rating the review , not the piece itself.
|
|
lordstu
LV37
Member since October 15, 2008
|
| Subject: Posted: February 14, 2011 05:00 am |
|
|
Still nothing to see here, people!
|
|
| Back to top |
Modified on February 18, 2011 01:13 pm
|